搜索引擎让我们丧失记忆：开云注册登录
there are those who Google and there are those who annoy those who Google . as a member of the former group，People who don ' t reflexively look thinnHowever，recently learned that those who turn to a search engine at the slightest mention of a forgotten factoid might not be all that better off我属于前一类。能主动在网上挖东西的人在最坏的情况下只会让我哑口无言，最坏的情况下不会让我对人类的命运感到害怕。
(威廉莎士比亚，哈姆雷特，希望如此)但是最近得知，有人记得某些半真半假的事情后，那些没有办法的搜索引擎的人不一定会去哪里。(威廉莎士比亚，泰姆派斯特，希望如此)Before discussing the latest research in this area，It ' s worth travelling back to 2011 when some commentators control在讨论这一领域的最新研究结果之前，2010年摘要那一年哥伦比亚大学(Columbia University)的Betsy Sparrow和他的同事们在《科学》杂志上发表了文章(Science)。以《谷歌对记忆的影响：查询资讯的便捷对理解的影响》(Google Effects on Memory : Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at our Fingertips)的名义引发了最近对网络的生死危机。
The researchers them selves had a positive take on their findings . sure，The test subjects were bad at recalling memorable bits of trivia-Suu研究者本身对他们的发现者持积极态度。最终，当受试者指出数据存储在眼前的电脑上时，他们不善于返回想忘记的细节，例如“鸵鸟的眼睛比大脑大”。
(威廉莎士比亚、鸵鸟、鸵鸟、鸵鸟、鸵鸟、鸵鸟、鸵鸟)最终，当被实验者发现数据将被存储起来时，他们需要更好地记住。但是有趣的部分是单独的实验。实验中的信息存储在常见的命名文件夹中，如“事实”、“数据”、“信息”。
the participants could recall which folder a fact was in nearly half of the time，But could only recall the facts them selves 23 per cent of the time .“or as dr sparrow told the new York times in an internet 3360”That kind of blew my mind”参与者可以在近一半的时间里回到他们认为不存在任何事实的文件夹，但只有23%的时间可以思考事实本身。正如研究人员所写：“事实的陈述容易记住，文件夹名称不容易记住，所以表面上看起来很意外。
”或者，正如斯帕罗拒绝接受《纽约时报》(纽约时报)采访时所说的那样，“我有点生气。“that we remember where facts can be obtained，rather than storing the information itself，is not new .the storage systems may be booked Usb金钥，the we B- or indeed colleagues or friends . when someone interrupts You at work and says，" hey "存储系统可以是书、笔记本、u盘、网络3354，实际上可以是同事或朋友。有人停下你的工作，说：“你好，我的幻灯片有问题。
我听说你是PPT高手。”问。
“他们把你当成记忆存储器。”盯着他们身后的墙壁，在寻求帮助之前，如果问是否曾用谷歌搜索过解决方案，那就是指出不想作为IT服务台。(威廉莎士比亚，温斯顿，工作)But those，like me，Who Google before asking for assistance may face an unexpected pitfall . according to research但是像我这样寻求帮助之前用谷歌搜索的人可能不会掉进意想不到的陷阱。上个月耶鲁大学(Yale University)学者公开的研究结果显示，至少在搜索引擎中使用的行为会导致我们低估自己的科学知识。
the researchers set up a number of experiments . in most of the scenarios，Half the subjects used a search engine to look up preselected topics and the接着，所有受试者都被拒绝评估提出与主题几乎相关的问题的能力。在第一阶段，搜索引擎中使用的人对自己能力的评价低于其他组。several experiments tested for a number of obvious explanations for why this over estimation might happen . what if the first group were told exacs T towhat if both groups spent the same amount of time performing the first step？or if the information being sought wasn ' t something the web could help with？or if no search results showed up at all？or if different search engines were used？为了测试这种低估不会再次发生的原因的很多明显的说明，有一些实验。
如果第一个组明确告诉搜索引擎输出，并给第二个组展示第一个组指向的同一篇文章，会怎么样？如果两组人花完全相同的时间迈出第一步，会怎么样呢？或者，如果互联网对正在寻找的信息没有帮助，会怎么样呢？如果搜查没有结果，会怎么样呢？如果用在其他搜索引擎上会怎么样？In every case，The group that had some interaction with a search engine rated them selves higher As to why this might be The case，The research engine Pending further research，This illusion of knowledge after interacting with a search engine may need to be added to the long list of common biases如果不是In the meantime、it may be worth remembering this possibility the next time you use a search engine . or、failing that或remember where。
本文关键词：搜索引擎,让,我们,丧失,记忆,开云,注册,登录,开云注册登录
本文来源：开云注册登录-www.uz110.com
